
The integration of NIR technology into any manufacturing business can yield significant cost savings through:
Reducing external wet chemistry testing easily demonstrates how quickly paybacks can be made on NIR investment. The case study below details the savings made by a multi-species feed manufacturing plant implementing NIR with INGOT calibrations.
Ingot can provide analysis for Group 1 and the bulk of Group 2, however not all traditional reference analysis can be replaced, as some is required to validate the performance of the NIR. Taking the annual tonnage figure we can estimate the cost of analysis per tonne, this calculation clearly demonstrates the cost justification for INGOT.
Approximate savings based on 100,000 tonne manufacturing plant |
||||
|
Testing |
Number of samples sent for analysis per annum |
Annual external wet chemistry costs |
Savings per annum using NIR with INGOT |
Group 1 |
Moisture, Oil, |
1,000 |
£42,600 |
£40,470 |
Group 2 |
Minerals, Starch, |
250 |
£28,950 |
£19,760 |
Group 3 |
Undesirables, |
40 |
£11,200 |
N/A |
|
Totals |
Costs £82,750 |
Savings £60,230 |
|
Analysis cost per tonne |
0.83p without INGOT |
0.23p with INGOT |
||